Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications (SIGMA)


SIGMA 22 (2026), 079, 69 pages      arXiv:2508.13759      https://doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2026.079

A Boundary Characterization of Turaev-Viro TQFTs

Max-Niklas Steffen and Christoph Schweigert
Department of Mathematics, University of Hamburg, AZ - Algebra and Number Theory, Bundesstraße 55,Hamburg, Germany

Received October 20, 2025, in final form August 07, 2026; Published online August 19, 2026

Abstract
We consider three-dimensional topological field theories on manifolds with boundary defects and identify explicit boundary locality conditions. We show that these conditions imply a state sum construction of the given TQFT. As a consistency check, we prove that Turaev-Viro state sum models obey the boundary locality conditions. Recent progress [Faria Martins J., Meusburger C., Adv. Math. 494 (2026), 110923, 102 pages, arXiv:2410.18049] in the description of defects in Dijkgraaf-Witten theories enables us to show that these theories likewise satisfy boundary locality. This directly implies that Dijkgraaf-Witten TQFTs with boundary defects admit a state sum description.

Key words: TQFT; boundary theories; defects; state sum models; Dijkgraaf-Witten theory.

pdf (1364 kb)   tex (1926 kb)  

References

  1. Balsam B., Kirillov Jr. A., Turaev-Viro theory as an extended TQFT, arXiv:1004.1533.
  2. Bartlett B., Three-dimensional TQFTs via string-nets and two-dimensional surgery, Quantum Topol. 17 (2026), 509-533, arXiv:2206.13262.
  3. Costantino F., Geer N., Patureau-Mirand B., Turaev V., Kuperberg and Turaev-Viro invariants in unimodular categories, Pacific J. Math. 306 (2020), 421-450, arXiv:1809.07991.
  4. Costantino F., Geer N., Patureau-Mirand B., Virelizier A., Non compact (2+1)-TQFTs from non-semisimple spherical categories, arXiv:2302.04509.
  5. Etingof P., Gelaki S., Nikshych D., Ostrik V., Tensor categories, Math. Surveys Monogr., Vol. 205, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2015.
  6. Etingof P., Nikshych D., Ostrik V., On fusion categories, Ann. of Math. 162 (2005), 581-642, arXiv:math.QA/0203060.
  7. Faria Martins J., Meusburger C., A geometrical description of untwisted 3d Dijkgraaf-Witten TQFT with defects, Adv. Math. 494 (2026), 110923, 102 pages, arXiv:2410.18049.
  8. Farnsteiner J., Generalized Frobenius-Schur indicators as Turaev-Viro invariants, Master's Thesis, University of Hamburg, 2020.
  9. Farnsteiner J., Schweigert C., Frobenius-Schur indicators and the mapping class group of the torus, Lett. Math. Phys. 112 (2022), 39, 30 pages, arXiv:2104.12742.
  10. Fuchs J., Schweigert C., Woike L., A first course in topological field theory, Univ. Lecture Ser., Vol. 80, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2026.
  11. Liu Z., Ming S., Wang Y., Wu J., 3-alterfolds and quantum invariants, arXiv:2307.12284.
  12. Liu Z., Ming S., Wang Y., Wu J., Alterfold topological quantum field theory, Sci. China Math., to appear, arXiv:2312.06477.
  13. Meusburger C., State sum models with defects based on spherical fusion categories, Adv. Math. 429 (2023), 109177, 97 pages, arXiv:2205.06874.
  14. Müller L., Woike L., Dimensional reduction, extended topological field theories and orbifoldization, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 53 (2021), 392-403, arXiv:2004.04689.
  15. Ng S.H., Schauenburg P., Congruence subgroups and generalized Frobenius-Schur indicators, Comm. Math. Phys. 300 (2010), 1-46, arXiv:0806.2493.
  16. Turaev V., Virelizier A., Monoidal categories and topological field theory, Progr. Math., Vol. 322, Birkhäuser, Cham, 2017.
  17. Walker K., A universal state sum, arXiv:2104.02101.

Previous article  Next article  Contents of Volume 22 (2026)