One Hat Cyber Team
Your IP :
216.73.216.115
Server IP :
194.44.31.54
Server :
Linux zen.imath.kiev.ua 4.18.0-553.77.1.el8_10.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Oct 3 14:30:23 UTC 2025 x86_64
Server Software :
Apache/2.4.37 (Rocky Linux) OpenSSL/1.1.1k
PHP Version :
5.6.40
Buat File
|
Buat Folder
Eksekusi
Dir :
~
/
home
/
vo
/
dal
/
art
/
View File Name :
semi.tex
\documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{amsthm} \author{Vasyl Ostrovskyi} \title{Centered one-parameter semigroups} \newtheorem{definition}{Definition} \newtheorem{proposition}{Proposition} \newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem} \newtheorem{remark}{Remark} \theoremstyle{remark} \newtheorem{example}{Example} \begin{document} \maketitle \begin{abstract} We introduce the class of centered one-parameter semigroups which are continuous analogue of a single centered operator, and study their properties. In particular, we prove the Wold decomposition for such semigroups and give complete description of one-parameter centered semigroups of partial isometries. \end{abstract} \section*{Introduction} Let $T$ be a bounded operator and write $T_k = T^k$. Recall \cite{mormu} that $T$ is centered if the operators $(T_kT_k^*, T_l^*T_l)$, $k$, $l\ge1$, form a commuting family. In this paper we introduce a continuous analogue of a centered operator---one-parameter centered semigroup. \begin{definition} Let $T_t$, $t\ge0$, be a strongly continuous semigroup of operators in a Hilbert space $H$. We say that the semigroup $T_t$ is centered, if the operators $(T_tT^*_t, T^*_s T_s)$, $t$, $s\ge0$, form a commuting family. \end{definition} \section{Centered semigroups} Let $T_t$, $t\ge0$ be a strongly continuous one-parameter semigroup. For every $t$ consider a polar decomposition $T_t = U_t C_t$, where $C$ is self-adjoint non-negative operator, $U_t$ is a partial isometry, and $\ker U_t = \ker C_t$. \begin{theorem} If $T_t$ is a centered semigroup, then $U_t$ is a strongly continuous centered semigroup of partial isometries. Conversely, if $U_t$ is a centered semigroup of partial isometries, then the semigroup $T_t$ is centered. \end{theorem} \begin{proof} Show that $U_t$ is a semigroup. First observe that the operator $U_tC_tU^*_t$ commutes with the family. Indeed, it is a non-negative square root of $T_tT_t^*$. Then, since $U_s^*U_s$ is a projection onto the co-kernel of $C_s$, we have \begin{align*} T_tT_s & = U_t C_t U_s C_s = U_t C_t U_s C_s (U_s^*U_s) = U_t C_t (U_sC_s U_s^*) U_s \\ &= U_t (U_s C_s U_s^*) C_t U_s = U_t U_s (C_s U_s^* C_t U_s). \end{align*} From the relation \[ C_s (U_s^* C_t U_s) = U_s^* U_s C_s U_s^* C_t U_s = U_s^* C_t U_s C_sU_s^* U_s = (U_s^* C_tU_s) C_s \] we see that $C_s U_s^* C_t U_s$ is a non-negative self-adjoint operator, its kernel coincides with $\ker U_tU_s$, and its square is \[ C_s U_s^* C_t U_s C_s U_s^* C_t U_s = T_s^*T_t^*T_tT_s = C_{t+s}^2. \] Therefore, $U_{t+s} = U_tU_s$, $t,s \ge 0$. For $t \to 0$, the operator $C_t = (T^*_t T_t)^{1/2}$ converges strongly to the identity; from this, one can easily deduce that $U_t$ is strongly continuous. Finally, we show that $U_t$ is a centered semigroup. But since $P_t = U_t^* U_t$ is a projection onto the co-kernel of $T_t^* T_t$, and $Q_t = U_t U_t^*$ is a projection onto the co-kernel of $T_t T_t^*$, these operators commute since $T_t$ is a centered semigroup. Now let $U_t$ be a centered semigroup. From $T_s T_t = T_{t+s}$ we have \begin{equation}\label{eq:utc} U_tC_t U_sC_s = U_{t+s}C_{t+s}, \end{equation} and multiplying by $U_s^*U_t^*$ from the right, we get \[ U_s^* C_t U_s C_s = C_{t+s}. \] Since $C_{t+s}$ is self-adjoint, taking the adjoints in the latter equality, we conclude that the operators $U_s^* C_t U_s$ and $C_s$ commute. Then for $t>s$ \[ C_t C_s = C_{s+(t-s)}C_s = U^*_s C_{t-s} U_s C_s C_s = C_s U^*_s C_{t-s} U_s C_s = C_s C_t, \] or $[T_t^*T_t, T_s^*T_s]=0$. Again, multiplying \eqref{eq:utc} by $U_t^*$ from the right, and by $U_s^*$ from the left, we get \begin{equation}\label{eq:ucu} C_t U_s C_s U_s^* = U_s C_{t+s} U_s^*. \end{equation} Taking adjoints and observing that the right-hand side is self-adjoint, we conclude that $C_t$ and $U_sC_s U_s^*$ commute, or $[T_t^*T_t, T_sT_s^*]=0$. Finally, applying \eqref{eq:ucu}, we have for $t>s$ \begin{multline*} U_sC_s U_s^* U_tC_tU_t^* = U_s C_s U_{t-s} C_t U_t^* = U_sC_s(U_{t-s} C_{(t-s)+s} U_{t-s}^*) U_s^* \\ =U_sC_s(U_{t-s}C_{t-s}U^*_{t-s} C_s) U_s^* = U_s (C_s U_{t-s} C_{t-s} U^*_{t-s}) C_s U^*_s \\ = U_s U_{t-s} C_t U_{t-s}^* C_s U^*_s = U_tC_tU_t^* U_sC_sU^*_s, \end{multline*} or $[T_sT^*_s, T_tT^*_t]=0$. Thus, the semigroup $T_t$ is centered. \end{proof} \section{Wold decomposition} \begin{theorem} Let $T_t$, $t\ge0$ be a centered semiroup in a Hilbert space $H$. The space $H$ can be decomposed into a direct sum of invariant with respect to $T_t$, $T_t^*$, $t\ge0$, subspaces, $H=H_0\oplus H_+ \oplus H_-\oplus H_1$ such that \begin{itemize} \item[\textup {i)}] in $H_1$ the operators $T_t$ are invertible, $\ker T_t = \ker T_t^*=\{0\}$, $t\ge0$\textup; \item[\textup{ii)}] in $H_+$ the semigroup is such that $\ker T_t = \{0\}$, $t\ge0$, $\bigcup_{t\ge0} \ker T_t^* = H$\textup; \item[\textup{iii)}] in $H_-$ the semigroup is such that $\ker T_t^* = \{0\}$, $t\ge0$, $\bigcup_{t\ge0} \ker T_t = H$\textup; \item[\textup{iv)}] in $H_0$ the semigroup is such that $\bigcup_{t\ge0} \ker T_t = H$, and $\bigcup_{t\ge0} \ker T_t^* = H$. \end{itemize} \end{theorem} \begin{proof} We start with one-parameter centered semigroups of partial isometries, and then apply the polar decomposition. Let $U_t$ be a centered one-parameter semigroup of partial isometries. Introduce the projections $P_t = U_t^*U_t$ and $P_{-t} = U_tU_t^*$, $t\ge0$. \end{proof} \section{Commutative models} Introduce the projections $P_t = U_t^*U_t$ and $P_{-t} = U_tU^*_t$, $t\ge0$, and the self-adjoint operators $A_t = C_t$, $A_{-t} = U_tC_tU^*_t$, $t\ge0$. \begin{proposition} The following relations hold $(s \ge0)$ for the projections $P_t$, $t\in \mathbb{R}$ \begin{align} P_t U_s &= U_s P_{t+s}, \quad t\ge 0, & P_t U_s^* & = U_s^* P_{t-s}, \quad t\ge s,\notag \\ P_t U_s &= U_s P_{t+s}, \quad t \le 0, t+s \le 0, & P_tU_s^* & = U_s^*, \quad 0\le t\le s,\notag \\ P_t U_s &= U_s, \quad t\le 0, t+s \ge 0, & P_tU_s^* & = U_s^* P_{t-s}, \quad t\le 0.\label{pu} \end{align} and for the operators $A_t$, $t \in \mathbb{R}$: \begin{align} A_t U_s A_s & = U_s A_{t+s}, \quad t\ge 0,\notag \\ A_t U_s & = U_s A_s A_{t+s}, \quad t\le 0, t+s \le 0,\notag \\ A_t U_s A_{t+s} & = U_s A_s, \quad t\le 0, t+s \ge0.\label{aua} \end{align} \end{proposition} \begin{proof} Just calculations. \end{proof} We rewrite the last relations in a slightly different form. Observe that on $\ker A_s^\perp$ the operator $A_s$ has (possibly unbounded) inverse $A_s^{-1}$. We define it on the whole space putting it zero on $\ker A_s$. Then we rewrite equalities \eqref{aua} as \begin{align} A_t U_s & = U_s A_{t+s}A_s^{-1},\quad t\ge 0,\notag \\ A_tU_s & = U_s A_{t+s} A_s, \quad t \le -s,\notag \\ A_t U_s & = U_s A_{t+s}^{-1} A_s, \quad -s \le t \le 0. \label{au} \end{align} Notice that since the left-hand side is bounded, such is the right one. Also we eliminated projections $P_s$ and $P_{t+s}$ on the kernels of $A_s$ and $A_{t+s}$, which is possible due to \eqref{pu}. On the space $\mathbb R^{\mathbb R}$ of all real functions introduce the mappings \[ F_s \lambda (t) = \begin{cases}\lambda(t+s)/\lambda(s),& t\ge0,\\ \lambda(s)/\lambda(t +s), & -s \le t \le 0, \\ \lambda(t +s)\lambda(s),& t \le -s. \end{cases} \] \textbf{Newtext} Consider the case when $C_t >0$, i.e., $\ker C_t = 0 $ for all $t$. Write $A_t = C_t$, $t\ge0$, $A_{-t}= U_t C_tU_t^*$. \begin{proposition} The following relations hold \[ A_t U_s = \begin{cases} U_s A_{t+s} A_s^{-1},& t\ge0,\\ U_s A_{t+s}^{-1} A_s, &-s \le t \le 0,\\ U_s A_{t+s} A_s, &t\le -s. \end{cases} \] \end{proposition} The operators $A_t$ form a commuting family; therefore (check?!), the following spectral decomposition holds: \begin{align*} H& = \int_\sigma^\oplus H_{\lambda(\cdot)} \, d\mu(\lambda(\cdot)), \\ (A_t f(\lambda))(\cdot) & = \lambda(t) \, f(\lambda(\cdot)), \end{align*} where $\sigma = \{ \lambda (\cdot) \colon \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} \mid \lambda(0) =1, \, \lambda(t) >0\}$. In particular, if the joint spectrum of the commutiong family is simple, \begin{align*} H& = L_2(\sigma, d\mu(\lambda(\cdot))), \\ (A_t f(\lambda))(\cdot) & = \lambda(t) \, f(\lambda(\cdot)). \end{align*} For any $s \ge0$ introduce the mappings $F_s \colon \sigma \to \sigma$, and $G_s = F_s^{-1}$ as follows: \begin{align*} (F_s(\lambda(\cdot)))(t) & = \begin{cases} \lambda(t+s)/\lambda(s), & t\ge0,\\ \lambda(s)/\lambda(t+s), & -s\le t \le 0, \\ \lambda(t+s)\, \lambda(s),& t\le s,\end{cases} \\ (G_s(\lambda(\cdot)))(t) & = \begin{cases} \lambda(t-s)\,\lambda(-s), & t\ge s,\\ \lambda(-s)/\lambda(t-s), & 0\le t \le s, \\ \lambda(t-s)/ \lambda(-s),& t\le 0,\end{cases} \end{align*} According to the theorem on commutative models, for $U_s$ we have the following representation: \[ (U_sf(\lambda))(\cdot) = \alpha_s(\lambda(\cdot))\, \rho_s(\lambda(\cdot)) \, f(G_s(\lambda)(\cdot)), \] where $\alpha_s$ is a unitary operator-valued function, $\rho$ is a norming factor. We consider some examples of quasi-invariant ergodic measures and the corresponding examples of centered semigroups. \begin{example} Stationary points. The simples case of an ergodic quasi-invariant measure is the measure concentrated at a stationary point. The only function invariant with respect to $F_s$, $G_s$, is the identity constant. Then $C_t = I$ for all $t$, and we have a strongly continuous unitary semigroup. \end{example} \begin{example} Measures concentrated on a single orbit. Take a function $\lambda(\cdot)\colon \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}_+$, $\lambda(0)=1$, and consider its orbit \[ \mathcal O = \{\lambda_s(\cdot) , s \in \mathbb R\}, \quad \lambda_s(t) = \begin{cases} (F_s \lambda(\cdot))(t), & s\ge 0,\\ (G_{-s}\lambda(\cdot))(t), & s \le 0.\end{cases} \] The mapping $\mathbb{R} \ni s \mapsto \lambda_s(\cdot)$ establishes a one-to-one correspondence between points of a line and $\mathcal O$. Take the Lebesgue measure on $\mathbb{R}$, and denote by $\mu$ its image under this mapping. Then $\mu$ is quasi-invariant measure on $\sigma$ concentrated on $\mathcal O$. The inverse mapping establishes an isomorphism between $L_2(\sigma, d\mu)$, and $L_2(\mathbb R, d s)$. Under this isomorphism we have \[ (A_t f) (s) = \lambda_s(t) \, f(s). \] \end{example} \section{Infinitesimal generators} \section{Centered semigroups of partial isometries} \bibliography{ref,2,new} \bibliographystyle{amsplain} \end{document}