One Hat Cyber Team
Your IP :
216.73.216.24
Server IP :
194.44.31.54
Server :
Linux zen.imath.kiev.ua 4.18.0-553.77.1.el8_10.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Oct 3 14:30:23 UTC 2025 x86_64
Server Software :
Apache/2.4.37 (Rocky Linux) OpenSSL/1.1.1k
PHP Version :
5.6.40
Buat File
|
Buat Folder
Eksekusi
Dir :
~
/
home
/
nosc
/
submit
/
Edit File:
Ergodic-Discr.tex
\documentclass{article} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{amssymb} \setcounter{MaxMatrixCols}{10} %TCIDATA{OutputFilter=LATEX.DLL} %TCIDATA{Version=4.00.0.2312} %TCIDATA{Created=Saturday, February 15, 2003 17:01:50} %TCIDATA{LastRevised=Friday, April 04, 2003 14:38:44} %TCIDATA{<META NAME="GraphicsSave" CONTENT="32">} %TCIDATA{<META NAME="DocumentShell" CONTENT="Standard LaTeX\Blank - Standard LaTeX Article">} %TCIDATA{Language=American English} %TCIDATA{CSTFile=article.cst} \newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem} \newtheorem{acknowledgement}[theorem]{Acknowledgement} \newtheorem{algorithm}[theorem]{Algorithm} \newtheorem{axiom}[theorem]{Axiom} \newtheorem{case}[theorem]{Case} \newtheorem{claim}[theorem]{Claim} \newtheorem{conclusion}[theorem]{Conclusion} \newtheorem{condition}[theorem]{Condition} \newtheorem{conjecture}[theorem]{Conjecture} \newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary} \newtheorem{criterion}[theorem]{Criterion} \newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition} \newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example} \newtheorem{exercise}[theorem]{Exercise} \newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma} \newtheorem{notation}[theorem]{Notation} \newtheorem{problem}[theorem]{Problem} \newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition} \newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark} \newtheorem{solution}[theorem]{Solution} \newtheorem{summary}[theorem]{Summary} \newenvironment{proof}[1][Proof]{\noindent\textbf{#1.} }{\ \rule{0.5em}{0.5em}} \input{tcilatex} \begin{document} \title{On the structure of invariant ergodic measures related with a class of ergodic discrete dynamical systems } \author{A.M. Samoylenko\thanks{% Mailling~address:~Institute Mathematics of NAS, Kyiv,~00601,~Ukraine}, Y.A. Prykarpatsky\thanks{% Mailling~address:~Institute Mathematics of NAS, Kyiv,~00601,~Ukraine} and A. K. Prykarpatsky\thanks{% Dept. of Applied Mathematics, the AGH University of Science and Technology, Cracow,\ 30059, Poland, and Institute for Applied Problem of Mechanics and Mathematics, National Academy of Sciences{}, Lviv, 79601 Ukraine} } \date{\today} \maketitle \begin{abstract} \noindent We study the problem of constructing an invariant ergodic measure naturally related with an ergodic discrete system on a topological phase space \ endowed with a structure of measurable space. Based on the classical Hardy results on functions series convergence we found an invariant ergodic measure represented in a smeared form of Lebesgue-Stiltjes type measures on the circle. \end{abstract} \section{Introduction} Suppose that a topological phase space \ $M$ \ is endowed with a structure of measurable space, that is a \ $\sigma $- algebra \ $A$($M$) \ of subsets in \ $M$, \ on which there is defined a finite measure $\mu $ : $% A(M)\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\dotplus },$ $\mu (M)=$1. \ As is \ well known, a measurable mapping \ $\varphi $ : $M\longrightarrow $ $M$ of the measurable space $(M,A(M))$ \ is called ergodic discrete dynamic system, if $% \mu $ - almost everywhere ($\mu $ - a.e.) there exists the not depending on $% x$ $\in M$ limit \ lim$_{n\longrightarrow \infty }\frac{\text{1}}{\text{2}}% \sum_{k=0}^{n-1}f(\varphi ^{k}x):=f_{\varphi }(x)$ \ for \ any bounded measurable function $f\in \mathcal{B}(M;\mathbb{R)},$ defining for all \ $% x\in M$ a finite measure \ $\mu _{\varphi }:A$($M$)$\longrightarrow \mathbb{R% }_{\dotplus }$ on $M$, such that \ $\int_{M}f_{\varphi }(x)d\mu (x):=\int_{M}f(x)d\mu _{\varphi }(x)$. \ The measure \ $\mu _{\varphi }:A$($% M $)$\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\dotplus }$ \ defined \ above has the following invariance property subject to the dynamical system $\ \varphi :M\longrightarrow M:\mu _{\varphi }(\varphi ^{-1}A)=\mu _{\varphi }(A)$ for any \ $A\in A(M)$. \ Moreover, if a \ $\sigma $- measurable set \ $A\in A(M)$ \ is invariant with respect to the mapping \ $\varphi :M\longrightarrow M$, that \ is $\varphi ^{-1}(A)=A$, \ then evidently $\mu _{\varphi }(A)=\mu (A)$% . Therefore the existence of the \ $\varphi $-invariant measure \ $\mu _{\varphi }:A$($M$)$\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\dotplus }$, \ coinciding with the measure $\mu :A$($M$)$\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\dotplus }$ on the $\sigma $ - algebra \ $\mathcal{I}(M)\subset A(M)$ \ of invariant (with respect to the dynamical system $\varphi :M\longrightarrow M)$ sets, is a necessary condition of the convergence $\mu $ - a.e. at $x\in M$ \ of mean values $f_{\varphi }(x)$ for any $f\in \mathcal{B}(M;\mathbb{R)}$. The inverse is also true: due to the Birkhoff theorem, if the mapping $\varphi :M\longrightarrow M$ conserves a finite measure \ $\mu _{\varphi }:A(M)\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\dotplus }$, mean values \ $f_{\varphi }(x) $ \ are convergent \ $\mu _{\varphi }$ - a.e. on $M$, and the set of convergency is invariant. \ Thus, if the reduction of the measure \ $\mu :A$(% $M$)$\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\dotplus }$ \ upon the invariant $\sigma $ - algebra $\ \mathcal{I}(M)\subset A(M)$ is absolutely continuous with respect to that of the measure \ $\mu _{\varphi }:A(M)\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\dotplus }$ , then the convergence holds $\mu $ - a.e. on $M$ . \ Thereby the problem of retrieving in analytical form the invariant measure $\mu _{\varphi }:A(M)\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\dotplus }$ \ corresponding to an ergodic \ mapping \ $\varphi :M\longrightarrow M$ \ is of great interest both from theoretical and practical points of view. Our article we devote to developing a measure generating function approach to constructing the invariant measure based on classical real analysis of functional series. Assume we are given a discrete dynamical system $\varphi :M\longrightarrow M$ . \ Then one can define measure generating functions (m.g.f.) $\mu _{\varphi }(\lambda ;A):=$lim$_{n\longrightarrow \infty }\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\lambda ^{k}\mu (\varphi ^{-k}A)$ , where \ $A\in A(M)$ \ and $|\lambda |<1$. \textbf{Lemma. \ }\textit{The m.g.f. satisfies the functional equation \ }$% \mu _{\varphi }(\lambda ;A)=\lambda \mu _{\varphi }(\lambda ;\varphi ^{-1}A)+\mu (A)$ \textit{for any }\ $A\in A(M)$ \textit{and} \ $|\lambda |<1$% . Based on this Lemma the following statements are proved: \textbf{Theorem 1. }\textit{Let the m.g.f. \ \ }$\mu _{\varphi }:$\textit{\ }% $\mathbb{C}\times $\textit{\ }$A(M)\longrightarrow \mathbb{C}$ ,\textit{\ corresponding to a discrete dynamical system \ }$\varphi :M\longrightarrow M$% , \textit{\ \ exist and satisfy the invariance condition. Then the limit expression \ }lim$_{\lambda \upharpoonright 1\text{ }(\mathcal{Q}\lambda =0)}(1-\lambda )\mu _{\varphi }(\lambda ;A)=\mu _{\varphi }(A)$\textit{\ holds \ for any \ }$A\in A(M).$ It is seen that the series $\mu _{\varphi }(\lambda ;A)$ generates \ analytical \ \ function as $\ |\lambda |<1$, having the following property: for any \ $\lambda \in (-1,1)$ \ and $A\in A(M)$ \ \ $\mathcal{Q}\mu _{\varphi }(\lambda ;A)=0$. Based now on classical analytical functions theory results one can formulate the main theorem. \textbf{Theorem 2. \ }\textit{Let a \ m.g.f. }$\mu _{\varphi }:$\textit{\ }$% \mathbb{C}\times $\textit{\ }$A(M)\longrightarrow \mathbb{C}$ \ \textit{% satisfy the above conditions. Then the following representation holds: \ }$% \mu _{\varphi }(\lambda ;A)=\int_{0}^{2\pi }\frac{(1-\lambda ^{2})d\sigma _{\varphi }(s;A)}{1-2\lambda \cos s+\lambda ^{2}}$ \textit{for \ any }$A\in A(M),$\ where $\sigma _{\varphi }($o$;A):[0,2\pi ]\rightarrow \mathbb{R}% _{\dotplus }$ \textit{\ is a \ function of bounded variation: \ }$0\leq \sigma _{\varphi }(s;A)\leq \mu (A)$ \textit{for any }$s\in \lbrack 0,2\pi ]$ \textit{and }$A\in A(M).$ This theorem looks exceptionally interesting for applications since it reduces the problem of detecting the invariant measure \ $\mu _{\varphi }:A(M)\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\dotplus }$ defined by (1.6) to calculation of the following complex analytical limit : \textit{\ }$\mu _{\varphi }(A)=lim_{\lambda \upharpoonright 1(\lambda =0)}\int_{0}^{2\pi }% \frac{2(1-\lambda ^{2})d\sigma _{\varphi }(s;A)}{1-2\lambda \cos s+\lambda ^{2}}$ , \ where $A\in A(M)$ and \ $\sigma _{\varphi }:[0,2\pi ]\times A(M)\rightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\dotplus }$ - some Stiltjes measure on $[0,2\pi ] $ , \ generated by a given \textit{a priori} dynamical \ system $\varphi :M\rightarrow M$ \ and a measure $\mu :A(M)\rightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\dotplus } $. For instance, in the case of the well known Gauss mapping \ $\varphi :M\rightarrow M$ , where $M=(0,1)$ and for any $x\in (0,1)$ \ $\varphi (x):=\{1/x\},$ \ ( here "\{o\}" \ means taking the fractional part of a number \ $x\in (0,1)),$ one can show by means of simple but a little cumbersome calculations, that its invariant measure on $\ M$ is given by the expression $\mu _{\varphi }(A)=\frac{1}{\ln 2}\int_{A}\frac{dx}{1+x}$ , \ yielding obviously, the well known Gauss measure $\mu _{\varphi }:A(M)\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\dotplus }$ on $M=(0,1)$. As a result , the following limit \ lim$_{n\longrightarrow \infty }\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}f(\varphi ^{n}x)\overset{\text{a.e. }}{=}\frac{1}{\ln 2}% \int_{0}^{1}f(x)/(1+x)dx$ for arbitrary $f\in L_{1}(0,1)$ \ is true. The analytical expression obtained above for the invariant measure $\mu _{\varphi }:A(M)\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\dotplus }$ , \ generated by a discrete dynamical system $\varphi :M\longrightarrow M$, looks interesting for applications. In particular, it is simply derived from (3.4) that the Stiltjes measure $\sigma _{\varphi }($o$;A):[0,2\pi ]\longrightarrow \lbrack 0,\mu (A)],A\in A(M),$ generates for any $s\in \lbrack 0,2\pi ]$ \ a new positive definite measure on $A\in A(M)$ as $\sigma _{\varphi }(s)(A)=\sigma _{\varphi }(s;A),$ which can regarded as the measure \ $\mu :A(M)\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\dotplus }$ smeared along the unit circle $% \ S^{1\text{ \ }}$in the $\func{complex}$ plane $\mathbb{C}$. \ \ \ \ \textbf{References:} \bigskip\ \ \ \ \ [1] \ Wheedon R., Zygmund A. Measure and integral: an introdaction to real analysis. Marcel Decker, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Inc., NY, \ \ and Basel,1977. \ \ \ \ [2] \ Sinai Ya.G. Ergodic theory. Nauka Publ., Moscow, 1984 (in Russian) \ \ \ \ [3] \ Hardy G., Convergent series., Cambridge Press, 1947. \ \ \ \ [4] \ Polya G., Sego H. Problems and solutios. Springer, Ny, 1982. \ \ \ \ [5] \ Privalov I.I. Boundary properties of analytical functions. Gostekhizdat, Publ., Moscow,1950. \ \ \ \ [6] \ Skorokhod A.V. Elements of the probability theory and czsual processes. Vyshcha Shkola Publ., Kyiv, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1975. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \end{document}
Simpan