One Hat Cyber Team
Your IP :
216.73.216.216
Server IP :
194.44.31.54
Server :
Linux zen.imath.kiev.ua 4.18.0-553.77.1.el8_10.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Oct 3 14:30:23 UTC 2025 x86_64
Server Software :
Apache/2.4.37 (Rocky Linux) OpenSSL/1.1.1k
PHP Version :
5.6.40
Buat File
|
Buat Folder
Eksekusi
Dir :
~
/
home
/
vo
/
book-newprint
/
IN
/
VO
/
FIN
/
Edit File:
CHAPT2B.TEX
\section{On complexity of description of classes of non self-adjoint operators} The borderline between the theory of operators and the theory of operator algebras and their representations can be viewed as a river with numerous two-way bridges joining the banks (see, for example, [,] and others). One of these bridges is discussed in this section: we consider an application of the theory of representations of $*$-algebras to a study of classes of operators that are singled out algebraically. Let $X$ be a bounded non-selfadjoint operator acting in a Hilbert space $H$. The classes of operators which satisfy to the polynomial relations $P_j(X,X^*)=0$ ($j=1,\ldots, m$) and more general relations are considered. For every such class corresponds the $*$-algebra $\frak A ={\Bbb C} \langle x,x^* \mid P_j(x,x^*)=0 , j=1,\ldots,m\rangle $. If the class of operators assigned by the non-polynomial relations then the corresponding $*$-algebra is given in more complicated way. Each representation $\pi$ of the $*$-algebra $\frak A$ determines the bounded operators $X=\pi(x)$ and $X^*=\pi(x^*)$ such that \begin{equation} P_j(X,X^*)=0 \qquad j=1,\ldots , m \end{equation} Conversely, a given operators $X$ and $X^*$ such that $P_j(X,X^*)=0$ ($j=1,\ldots,m$) uniquely define a representation of the whole algebra $\frak A$. To describe the class of operators which satisfying relations (1), up to a unitary equivalence, is equivalented to describing representations of the corresponding $*$-algebra $\frak A$. For such algebras we estimate the complication of the corresponding problem of the $*$-representations theory. It means complication of the unitary description of the corresponding class of operators. We consider classes of operators connected with relations that could be quadratic, semilinear, cubic, and others (Section 3.2.1). Then we study complexity of the unitary description of algebraic operators (Section \ref{S:3.2.2}), partial isometries, and weakly centered operators (Section \ref{S:3.2.3}). \subsection{Classes of non self-adjoint operattors selected by a quadratic or a cubic relation} The normal operators $X$, that is operators for which $XX^*=X^*X$. It is the most studied region of civilization on a territory of bounded linear operators. The irreducible normal operators are one-dimantional. The spectral theorem gives an assembly prodedure of any normal operators from irreducible. 1.Let we have a pair of operators $X$ and $X^*$ which satisfy to quadratic relations \begin{gather}\label{cond} P_2(X,X^*)=P_2^*(X,X^*)=0 \end{gather} The common form of such relations is the following \begin{eqnarray}\label{polynom2} P_2(X,X^*)=a(X^2+(X^*)^2)+(b/i)(X^2-(X^*)^2)+c[X,X^*]+ \\ +d \{X,X^*\}+e(X+X^*)+(f/i)(X-X^*)+gI=0 \end{eqnarray} (here $a,b,c,d,e,f,g \in{\Bbb R}$) Now we give a criterion in the terms of coefficient, that the the relation (it's means a corresponding $*$-algebra) \begin{theorem}\label{quadr2} A corresponding $*$-algebra is a $*$-wild if and only if there are one of the following conditions: \begin{enumerate} \item $ a=b=c=d=e=f=g=0$ \item $ (g-\frac {e^2}{2(a+d)})(a+d)<0$, $d-a=b=c=f=0$; \item $ (g-\frac {f^2}{2(d-a)})(d-a)<0$, $a+d=b=c=e=0$; \item $b^2=(d^2-a^2) \ne 0, \quad (a+d)(g-\frac{e^2}{2(a+d)})<0$, $ \frac{e^2}{(a+d)}=\frac{f^2}{(d-a)} $, $c=0$. \end{enumerate} \end{theorem} This theorem immediatly follows from theorem(\ref{quadr1}), by change of variables $X=A+iB$, $X^*=A-iB$ It is easy to see that the relations between coefficients is the next $\alpha =a+d$, $\beta=d-a$, $\gamma =2b$, $\hbar =2c$, $\epsilon=2f$, $\chi=g$. 2. Now we will consider some classes of non self-adjoint operators which satisfy to the cubic relation. At first we will go to pair of self-adjoint operators by change $X=A+iB$ and $X^*=A-iB$. Let selfadjoint operators $A$ and $B$ satisfy to the cubic semilinear relations (linear on $B$). The common form of such relations with condition $P_3(A,B)=P^*_3(A,B)$ is following \begin{eqnarray}\label{qpline} P_3(A,B)&=& \alpha B + 2\beta \{A,B\} +\epsilon \{A^2,B\} + 2\mu ABA +\nonumber \\ &&+i\gamma\left [A,B\right ]+ i\delta\left [A^2,B \right ] =0 \end{eqnarray} ($\alpha, \beta, \gamma, \delta \in {\Bbb R}^1 $). It is easy to see that in terms of $X$ and $X^*$ the relation (\ref{qpline}) have the next form \begin{eqnarray}\label{qupline} &&P_3(X,X^*)=(a/i)(X-X^*) + (b/i)(X^2-(X^*)^2) +\nonumber \\ &&+ (c+d)/i(X^3- (X^*)^3) + (c-d)/i(XX^*X-X^*XX^*)+ \nonumber\\&& (d/i)(\{X^2,X^*\}+\{X,(X^*)^2\}) + f\left [ X,X^* \right ] +g\left [ X^*,X^2 \right ] + \nonumber \\&& + g\left [(X^*)^2,X \right ] =0 \end{eqnarray} Where $ a=(\alpha/2), b=\beta, c=\epsilon/4, d=\mu/4, f=\gamma/2, g=\delta/4$. Denotes $I_1=8c$, $I_2=c^2-4d^2$, $I_3=a(c^2-4d^2)-b^2(c-4d)$ $I_4(2gb-cf)$ and give the theorem. \begin{theorem} The relation (\ref{qupline}) with condition $c\geq0$, $c^2+d^2+g^2 \ne 0$ is $*$-wild if and only if: \begin{enumerate} \item if $f=g=0$, then there are one of the following conditions: \begin{enumerate} \item $I_1>0$, $I_2>0$, $I_3<0$ \item $I_2<0$, $I_3=0$ \item $I_1>0$, $I_2<0$, $I_3\ne 0$ \item $I_2=0$, $I_3=0$, $ b^2-2ac>0 $ \item $I_2=0$, $I_3\ne 0$ \end{enumerate} \item if $c=d=b=a=0$, then $g\ne 0$. \item If $g(c^2+d^2) \ne 0$ then there are one of the following conditions: \begin{enumerate} \item If $c \geq 0$, $d=0$, $2ag^2-cf^2 < 0$ then \item $d\ne 0, I_4 \ne 0$, $ac^2-I_3-(df-gb-2I_4)(2fc^2/g^2)=0$ \end{enumerate} \end{enumerate} \end{theorem} 3. A known class of quasinormal non self-adjoint operators (seen \cite ) is a class of operators $X$ which commute with $X^*X$. It is operators of representations of a $*$-algebra $\frak K={\Bbb C}\langle x, x^* \mid xx^*x=x^*xx\rangle$. From relation $[x,x^*x]=0$ and condition $P(x,x^*)=P^*(x,x^*)$ follows that $[x^*,x^*x]$. Therefore, for the irreducible representations $X^*X=\lambda I$ ($\lambda \ge 0$). Then either $X=X^*=0$, either $\lambda \ge 0$ and $\frac{X}{\sqrt \lambda}= \frac {e^{i\phi}}{\sqrt \lambda}$, either $\frac{X}{\sqrt \lambda}$ is a unilateral shift. There exists a corresponding structure theorem (see \cite). 4. Now we consider the other class of the non-selfadjoint operators $X\in L(H)$ such that $[X^2,X^*]=0$, that is \begin{equation}\label{nonself1} X^2X^*=X^*X^2 \end{equation} Then, the conjugate relation is the next \begin{equation}\label{nonself2} (X^*)^2X=X(X^*)^2 \end{equation} Let $X=A+iB$ ($A=A^*$, $B=B^*$). Then the operators of this class is selected by the next relations \begin{equation}\label{selfad1} [A^2,B]=[B,A^2]=0 \end{equation} The irreducible reprethentations of the pair $A,B$, wich satisfy to the relations (\ref{selfad1}) are one-dimational and two-dimantional. These representations up to unitary equivalence have the next form: one-dimentional -- $A=a$, $B=b$ ($a,b\in {\Bbb R}$); two-dimantional: $A=a\begin{pmatrix} 1&0 \\ 0&-1 \end{pmatrix}$, $B=b\begin{pmatrix} 0&1 \\ 1&0 \end{pmatrix}$ ($a>0, \quad b>0$) 5. In Section we were considered the algebra $\frak B_3={\Bbb C}\langle x,y \mid xyx=yxy \rangle$. If on this algebra is defined the involution $x^{\star}=y$ then the representations of the corredponding $*$-algebra responds the nex class of the operators $X$ such that \begin{equation}\label{coso} XX^*X=X^*XX^* \end{equation} \subsection{Partial isometries and weakly centered operators} We consider only the following $*$-algebras (classes of operators) $\frak W\frak C ={\Bbb C} \langle x,x^* \mid [xx^*,x^*x] =0\rangle$ (weakly centered operators); $\frak P\frak I ={\Bbb C}\langle x,x^*\mid (x^*,x)^2=x^*x$ (partial isometry) $\frak W\frak P={\Bbb C} \langle x,x^* \mid[xx^*,x^*x] =0, (x^*x)^2=x^*x\rangle$ (weakly centered operators which are partial isometry) \begin{theorem} The $*$-algebra $\frak W\frak C$ is $*$-wild. \end{theorem} \begin{proof}. We give the homomorphism $\psi:\frak W\frak C \to M_{3}( F_2)$ as $$ \psi(x)= \left (\begin{array}{ccc} 0&0&2e \\ (1/2)e& (\sqrt {3}/2)v & 0 \\ (\sqrt {3}/2)u & - (1/2)uv & 0 \end{array} \right). $$ To show that this is a homomorphism, we calculate that $$ \psi(x)\psi(x^*)= \left(\begin{array}{ccc} 2e&0&0 \\ 0&e&0 \\ 0&0&e \end{array}\right), \psi(x^*)\psi(x)= \left(\begin{array}{ccc} e&0&0 \\ 0&e&0 \\ 0&0&2e \end{array}\right) .$$ Therefore $[\psi(x)\psi(x^*),\psi(x^*)\psi(x)] =0$. The homomorphism $\psi $ induces the functor ${\mathcal {F}}_\psi: Rep(C^*({\mathcal {F}}_2) \to Rep \frak W\frak I$ as follows \begin{itemize} \item if $\rho \in Ob (Rep C^*({\mathcal {F}}_2$): $\rho(u)=U$ and $\rho(v)=V$, then $F_{\psi}(\rho)= \rho \otimes \psi= \pi$, where $\pi(x)=X$ and $\pi(x^*)=X^*$; \item if $C: \rho \to \hat \rho$ (that is $CU=\hat {U} C,\quad CV=\hat {V} C$) , then $F_{\psi}(C)=\mathcal { C}=\left[ \begin{array}{ccc} C&0&0 \\ 0&C&0 \\ 0&0&C \end{array} \right]$ and $\mathcal { C}:\pi \to \hat \pi$ ( that is $\mathcal { C}X=\hat X \mathcal { C}$, $\mathcal { C}X^*=\hat X^* \mathcal { C}$). \end{itemize} We will show that $F_{\psi}$ is full. It follows from $\mathcal { C}X^*X=\hat X^* \hat X \mathcal { C}$ that $$ \mathcal { C} = \left [\begin{array}{ccc} C_{11}&C_{12}&0 \\ C_{21}& C_{22}& 0 \\ 0&0&C_{33}\end{array}\right]. $$ From the relations $\mathcal { C}X=\hat X \mathcal { C}$, $\mathcal { C}X^*= \hat X^* \mathcal { C}$ we have that $C_{12}=C_{21}=0$, $C_{11}=C_{22}= C_{33}=C$ and $CU=\hat UC$, $CV=\hat VC$. Hence, we can conclude that the functor $F_ {\psi} $ is full. Therefore, the algebra $\frak W\frak C$ is $*$-wild. \end{proof} \begin{theorem} The $*$-algebra $\frak P\frak I$ is $*$-wild. \end{theorem} \begin{proof} We will show that $\frak P\frak I \succ C^*(\mathcal { F}_2$. The homomorphism $$\psi:\frak P\frak I \to M_3(\mathcal { F}_2))$$ is $$ \psi(x)=\left( \begin{array}{ccc} (\sqrt{3}/4)u & (\sqrt{3}/2)e&0 \\ (3/4)v & -(1/2)vu^*&0 \\ (1/2)e &0&0 \end{array}\right). $$ It is easy to verify that $\psi(x^*)\psi(x)= \left( \begin{array}{ccc} e&0&0 \\ 0&e&0 \\ 0&0&0 \end{array}\right) $. Therefore $(\psi(x^*)\psi(x))^2=\psi(x^*)\psi(x)$, hence the homomorphism $\psi$ has been defined correctly. The proof that the induced functor $F_{\psi}: Rep C^*(\mathcal { F_2}) \to Rep\frak P\frak I)$ is full is similar to the proof in previous theorem. \end{proof} \begin{theorem} The $*$-algebra $\frak W\frak P$ is $*$-wild. \end{theorem} \begin{proof} We will again shown that $\frak W\frak P \succ C^*(\mathcal { F}_2) $. We give the homomorphism $\psi: \frak W\frak P \to M_4(\mathcal {F}_2)$ as follows: $$\psi(x)= \left(\begin{array}{cccc} (\sqrt{3}/4)u & (\sqrt{3}/2)e&0&0 \\ (3/4)v & -(1/2)vu^*&0 &0 \\ (1/2)e &0&0&0 \\ 0&0&e&0 \end{array}\right). $$ It is easy to show that the corresponding functor $F_{\psi}$ :$Rep C^*(\mathcal { F}_2) \to Rep \frak P\frak I$ is full. \end{proof} \subsection{Algebraic operators} \begin{corollary} \label{cor7} Let $\mathfrak{A}_{R_3} = \mathbb{C} \langle x \mid R_3(x) \buildrel {\rm def} \over = (x-\alpha_1 e) (x-\alpha_2 e)(x-\alpha_3 e) =0$, $\alpha_1$, $\alpha_2$, $\alpha_3 \in \mathbb{C}$, $\alpha_k \ne \alpha_l \text{ for } k\ne l\rangle$. Then $\mathfrak{A}_{R_3} \succ \mathfrak{Q}_{2,\perp}$, and consequently, the $*$-algebra $\mathfrak{A}_{R_3}$ is $*$-wild. \end{corollary} \begin{proof} Define the homomorphism $\psi \colon \mathfrak{A}_{R_3} \to \mathfrak{Q}_{2,\perp}$ as follows: \[ \psi(a) = \alpha_1 q_1 + \alpha_2q_2 +\alpha_3(e-q_1 -q_2). \] It is easy to check that the functor $F_\psi$ is full and faithful. \end{proof} \begin{remark} Corollary~\ref{cor7} is given in \cite{19}. The proof in \cite{19} actually uses the fact that the problem of unitary classification of two orthogonal idempotents is $*$-wild, and implicitly contains this proof. \end{remark} 4)Let X be a hyponormal operator, that is $XX^*-X^*X \ge 0$. Let $Y$ be a transcendental quasinilpotent operator, that is $lim_{n \to \infty} \mid \mid Y^n \mid \mid ^{1/n} \to 0$. The problems to describe the hyponormal operators and transcendental quasinilpotent operators are $*$-wild. \subsection{Connection between algebraic and $*$-wild problems} %\end{document}
Simpan